22/07/2026

On corporate support for Israel’s occupation


Rights groups sue France over failure to prevent corporate support for Israel’s occupation

 

Five human rights organisations filed a legal challenge this Wednesday before the Conseil d’État, France’s highest administrative court, seeking an order requiring the French government to adopt effective measures to prevent French corporate and financial actors from contributing to Israel’s unlawful occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). 



Paris, 22 July 2026.
The plaintiffs–the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Jurists for the Respect of International Law (JURDI), the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP), La Ligue des droits humains (LDH) and Law for Palestine–argue that France has failed to meet its obligations under international law by not implementing effective measures to prevent companies and financial institutions from engaging in trade, investment, and other commercial activities that sustain Israel’s continued unlawful presence in the OPT. They are represented by Henri Thulliez, Yacine Baita, and Frédéric Thiriez, and advised by Open Society Justice Initiative. The defendants include the French Prime Minister and several ministers responsible for the economy, foreign affairs, and commerce.

The case builds on the July 2024 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in which the Court said it is of the opinion that Israel’s continued presence in the OPT is unlawful and clarified that all states are obligated not to recognise as legal the situation arising from Israel’s unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and to neither render aid nor assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel’s continued presence in the OPT. The World Court further clarified that states must take steps to prevent trade and investment relations that contribute to the illegal occupation. The applicants contend that France has not translated these obligations into concrete regulatory or enforcement measures.

James Goldston, Executive Director of Open Society Justice Initiative, said "The International Court of Justice left no doubt that states cannot stand on the sidelines when faced with legal obligations. This case is about ensuring that France halts any aid or assistance for the unlawful occupation of Palestine. International law only has force if states are prepared to implement it in practice."

Ihsan Adel, Founder and Chair of Law for Palestine, stressed that "States cannot comply with their obligations while settlement goods remain on their markets and corporations continue settlement-related business activities."

The ICJ’s position on third-states obligations towards the situation in the OPT underscore that the occupation has been sustained not only by military force but also by the economic support of third states and private actors to the detriment of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and sovereignty over their land and resources.

Alexis Deswaef, President of FIDH, described the case "as an opportunity for the Conseil d’État to take a strong stance and reaffirm the State’s responsibilities with respect to corporate activities in occupied Palestine."

Ghislain Poissonnier, Vice President for JURDI, said: "JURDI notes that despite the ICJ’s 2024 Advisory Opinion, deeming the occupation illegal, France has not acted, making legal action necessary to end its corporate support to the illegal situation in occupied Palestine".

Although France recognised the State of Palestine in September 2025, it has not implemented effective measures that address any economic and commercial relations linked to the illegal occupation.

Before filing the case, the plaintiffs formally requested that the French government adopt measures to comply with the binding legal obligations set out in the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion, including preventing trade and investment that sustain the unlawful situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) and ensuring French companies do not contribute to it. The government did not respond but issued new recommendations to French businesses operating in the settlements on June 30th, 2026, that expose "themselves to the risk of being found guilty of violating international law".

For the claimants, the government failed to respond to their request, which amounts to an implicit administrative decision allowing the plaintiffs to challenge it before the Conseil d’État. They argue that this inaction contradicts France’s own public support for the Advisory Opinion and its acknowledgment of the duty to distinguish between Israel and the OPT in economic dealings. Citing evidence that French companies continue operating in sectors such as transportation, construction, finance, and commercial services in the OPT, the plaintiffs contend that France has failed to regulate corporate conduct and prevent businesses from contributing to violations of Palestinians’ rights. They are asking the Conseil d’État to declare the State’s inaction unlawful and order measures to ensure compliance with international law, including restrictions on occupation-linked trade and investment, corporate safeguards, and monitoring mechanisms.

-

Read our Questions and answers here.

Mamdani on Netanyahu

 



- Zohran Kwame Mamdani, Mayor of New York City


"The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu for a reason. He should be arrested and stand trial. My administration examined every legal avenue available to determine whether New York City could execute that warrant. The law is clear: we do not have that authority. The federal government does." 

"So we are calling on the United States to uphold international law, cooperate with the ICC, apprehend Benjamin Netanyahu and transfer him to The Hague to face justice. We cannot end this genocide on our own. But we can use every tool available to defend humanity and uphold justice. That is the responsibility of this city. And it is my commitment as mayor."



15/07/2026

Stop atrocities in Sudan's El-Obeid

 



G7, EU urge halt to attacks in Sudan's El-Obeid, calls for wider arms embargo


G7 foreign ministers and the European Union's foreign policy chief on Wednesday urged Sudan's Rapid Support Forces and allied armed groups to stop all actions that could lead to further atrocities or endanger civilians in El-Obeid.



Displaced women in El Obeid (Reuters)


"We, the G7 Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union urge the Rapid Support Forces and allied armed groups to immediately cease any action likely to lead to further atrocities or endanger civilians in El-Obeid, including drone strikes and impediments to humanitarian access," the statement reads.

The ministers also called on all parties, including the Sudanese army, to cease hostilities, allow aid access and engage in good-faith talks.

"Following the atrocities committed during the Rapid Support Forces’ siege and attack on El Fasher, we remain gravely concerned about alleged severe violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law across Kordofan and Darfur regions, as well as Blue Nile in Sudan," the statement continues.

The countries urge the Rapid Support Forces, as well as the Sudanese Armed Forces and allied armed groups, "to abide by their obligations under the rules of international humanitarian law and international human rights law, as applicable," it adds, as "civilians must be protected."

The G7 therefore calls on parties to the conflict to guarantee safe voluntary passage, and to facilitate rapid and unimpeded humanitarian access into and around El-Obeid and throughout the country.

Ministers also backed United Nations' efforts to de-escalate the crisis, called on the UN Security Council to expand the Darfur arms embargo to all of Sudan, urged external actors to halt military and financial support to the warring sides, and vowed to promote accountability for violations while supporting Sudan's unity and democratic aspirations.

"We support the efforts of the United Nations Secretary-General’s Personal Envoy, Mr. Pekka Haavisto, to advance de-escalation in El-Obeid and support ongoing broader efforts by the Quad and the Quintet to achieve a humanitarian truce, followed by a permanent ceasefire and an independent, inclusive, transparent and civilian-led political dialogue," the statement reads.


Spiralling crisis

Sudan has been at war since April 2023, with serious reports of human rights violations and crimes against humanity.

This war between Sudan's army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, now in its fourth year, has displaced millions and devastated much of the country. Aid agencies have repeatedly warned of worsening food insecurity and limited humanitarian access.

The conflict has been described as the current worst humaniratian crisis in the world by the UN.

According to a senior World Food Programme (WFP) official, the country now risks sliding backwards into deeper hunger as conflict, aid funding cuts and rising agricultural costs driven by disruption linked to the Iran war threaten to reverse gains made after famine took hold in parts of the country, said on Tuesday.

Around 5 million people facing emergency or catastrophic levels of hunger, even after an intensive aid response helped reduce the number of people in famine-like conditions, Carl Skau, the WFP's acting executive director, told Reuters.

"It's a massive crisis, both in terms of numbers, but also the gravity," he said, adding that more than 100,000 people were still facing famine-like conditions, placing them in the highest level of the UN-backed IPC hunger classification.

"With these kinds of numbers in IPC (Phase) 5 starvation it is extremely, extremely serious," he said.

Across Sudan, nearly 19.5 million people face high levels of acute food insecurity, according to the IPC.


-


On the evolution of the war, you can also listen to our recent podcast episode:

Sudan: Three years of war and new reports of meddling by Ethiopia



14/07/2026

Gorillaz

 

Gorillaz - 'Damascus' 

(ft. Omar Souleyman & Yasiin Bey) 

 Live Together For Palestine




03/07/2026

'Comfortably Numb Re-Imagined' for Palestine

 


29/06/2026

Uganda media shutdown - Update

 

28/06/2026

Media shutdown in Uganda

 

In Uganda, President Yoweri Museveni's son, Muhoozi Kainerugaba, is the head of the military, and this Sunday, he ordered the shutdown of newspapers, TV station and radio outlets, including NTV and the Monitor.  


Uganda's leading independent media group said it was under "military siege" on Sunday. This comes amid a widespread crackdown on free speech, accelerated by the army chief.


"NTV and Moniter (sic) are being shut down from today!" Kainerugaba wrote on social media platform X, referring to NTV Uganda and the Daily Monitor, both part of the Nation Media Group.


"In Uganda, I DO NOT believe in a free press! The press should be guided by cadres of the revolution," he added.


He also threatened to close more media outlets: "The closure of NTV and Monitor is just the beginning. We are going to arrest many more," he added on X.


Muhoozi Kainerugaba



-


Ugandan journalists are appalled and afraid...


Other outlets, including Dembe FM, Spark TV, KFM, and The East African, are also affected.


One told me an hour ago: "It seems that he is the one running the show. He has over the past months, become very influential on almost every thing in the country. He makes orders on social media and orders arrests of people."


To him, it displays pure abuse of power.


"That man is just out of control. He has a cultic following that selfishly trying to make personal gains by boosting his ego."


-


The Daily Monitor was launched in 1992 and became one of Uganda's most influential independent newspapers and has often been seen as an irritation by Museveni's government.


Kainerugaba confirmed on X that the orders had been approved by his father, Yoweri Museveni, who has ruled Uganda for 40 years.


Museveni, 81, won another term in January but many see his son as positioning himself to take over.


I was expecting to go, but I wasn't able to get the press accreditation, which is now over $1000, and most of my colleagues were expelled anyway after a couple of days.


-



For more on the situation in Uganda since the general "elections" in January, my podcast episode from earlier this year: Lack of democracy and military grip...


https://www.rfi.fr/en/podcasts/spotlight-on-africa/20260120-spotlight-on-africa-uganda-vote-and-somaliland-recognition-roil-east-africa







24/06/2026

newsletter - end of June 2026

 


Artist Grada Kilomba on her monument for lost Rwandan lives. And the fate of DRC's coltan...

In a podcast episode, I speak to the artist on how she chose to represent a genocide. I also interviewed Global Witness on their latest report on critical minerals from the DR Congo.



Artist Grada Kilomba on her monument for lost Rwandan lives. And the fate of DRC's coltan...

In a podcast episode, I speak to the artist on how she chose to represent a genocide. I also interviewed Global Witness on their latest report on critical minerals from the DR Congo.